Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Hit Counter

Total: 901,467
since: 4 Apr 2004

Blog Status

  • 4 yrs 16 wks 0 days old
  • Updated: 25 Jul 2008
  • 1,470 entries
  • 6,865 comments

Calendar

««Jul 2008»»
SMTWTFS
  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
242526
2728293031

Unequally Yoked?

posted Wednesday, 7 July 2004

I was talking with J the other day and she asked me, "Do you know just how hard it is to love someone who is nonmonogamous?" And then she proceeded to ask why it was that I was so opposed to legal monogamous marriage. After I'd once again rattled off my beliefs on the matter, it struck me. Why on earth should I be having to justify myself, especially when the monogamous do not feel as if they have to justify why they have chosen to conform to prevailing custom, as if it should be self evident?

Of course, this difference in belief is rarely a concern in strictly casual sexual encounters; perhaps that is why I usually feel more comfortable with them. There's no questioning the purpose of these encounters on either side, so I'm free to enjoy them for what they are, with no misunderstandings likely to arise. But the longer a casual sexual relationship goes on, especially if my partner is "single", the more likely I will eventually be called upon to justify my libertinism.

There have been some who would not change a thing about me and like me just the way I am, but rather often, there is an unspoken wish that I would eventually give up being nonmonogamous to settle down and be domesticated like "everyone else", out of love.

I am forty-six years old and the longest I've remained "faithful" to a particular partner is less than two weeks. So, I really cannot see such a thing as being likely to happen and I refuse to make that promise to anyone, knowing I have neither the desire nor the ability to do so. However, this doesn't mean I am incapable of loving someone on a long term basis. I can and I have. But I refuse to accept sexual fidelity as a condition of love. As I've stated countless times, sex and love are not synonymous and even though they many times happily coexist, many other times they just as happily do not.

So, I would say it is no doubt as hard for a libertine to love a conventionally mongamous person as it is the other way around. But I'd wager it is not a totally insurmountable barrier if those involved are motivated enough to make it work. It wouldn't be an easy thing, certainly, but then again, nothing worth having ever is.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Shet Quaker left...
Sunday, 18 July 2004 9:35 pm

Wow. This has been the topic of many a long conversation amongst my friends and I. I have a couple of friends or are "polyamorous" and I admire them. They have within them an incredible amount of love and the ability to separate emotions and physical attraction which I envy. I've had partners who have been nonmonagomous in a dishonest way. I would have rather they been honest about their desires. I don't know if I would have stayed with them, but I could have made decisions about my own life in an informed way. I wish I could separate emotions and physical intimacy. I also wish I could be bisexual. The latter I'm pretty sure I have no control over. The former I'm still trying to figure out.

Visit me @ http://takeaction.blog-city.com


2. --W-- left...
Monday, 19 July 2004 6:47 am

The key to it all is honesty: honesty to others about what you are all about, and honesty to yourself about what you really need and want, not what you "should" need/want.

By the way, I am not bisexual, but strictly heterosexual.


Tag Related Posts

Amazon: Related Items

Search Box

 

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Widget_logo
The WeatherPixie

Most Popular Tags

                                                                                                   

Libertine Links

Contact Info

Contact Me

Email: Libertine58@gmail.com
YIM: Libertine58
AIM: Libertine1958